Regulatory Rails And Recurring Payments: Key Takeaways From HSC Conference Ho Chi Minh City 2026
In Brief
HSC Conference 2026 in Ho Chi Minh City explored institutional crypto adoption, stablecoins, RWA tokenization and regulatory clarity.
The HSC Conference, dedicated to bridging cryptocurrency and institutional finance, concluded in Ho Chi Minh City on August 15, 2026.
Hosted by Mpost Media Group, the event brought together financial institutions, policymakers, technology companies, and academic representatives. More than 40 speakers addressed blockchain infrastructure, digital assets, and the evolution of on-chain financial markets. Key themes ranged from institutional adoption and RWA tokenization to stablecoin payments, fragmented liquidity, and Vietnam’s emerging role at the intersection of AI and blockchain.
The day’s sessions reflected a broader industry shift from experimental pilots to production-grade financial infrastructure — a thread that ran through both the stage program and conversations on the floor.
Regulatory Clarity as the Gateway to Institutional Crypto Adoption
Among the standout sessions was “What Institutional Digital Asset Adoption Actually Looks Like,” which brought together Nicole Nguyen, Founder of APAC DAO; Queenie Le, Regional Expansion Lead, APAC at Tether; Ben El-Baz, Managing Director and Head of International Markets at HashKey Group; Will Ross, Chief Client Officer at Dragon Capital; and Vadim Krekotin, Managing Partner at HSC Asset Group.
The panel explored what real institutional adoption of crypto looks like in practice, emphasizing that regulation, concrete use cases, and integration with existing financial infrastructure matter more than simply holding digital assets. Speakers discussed tokenized assets, regulatory licensing, Vietnam’s funding needs, and the need for traditional institutions and crypto companies to collaborate through practical, compliant rails.
The speakers converged on a shared diagnosis: regulatory clarity is the single most important condition for institutional adoption, but it remains uneven and incomplete.
Will Ross noted that institutions’ hands are effectively tied — they cannot invest in or fundraise through digital assets without explicit regulatory approval, no matter how compelling the opportunity. “We cannot arbitrarily say we’re going to invest in digital assets without having the regulatory approval to do that. Our hands are tied until the regulatory pathway enables us to move forward,” he said.
Ben El-Baz framed Vietnam as being in “phase one,” where getting exchanges licensed creates the foundation for more complex use cases to follow organically, noting that “what’s really exciting is what happens after you have this foundation — seeing there being a regulatory framework unlocks ideas and use cases from corporates that go well beyond the exchanges themselves.”
Vadim Krekotin stressed that the current direction is clear — governments are not going to let crypto fully replace existing financial systems, so the only viable path is to understand the regulatory framework in place, follow it precisely, and build creatively within those constraints. Queenie Le added a ground-level dimension: even where institutions want to engage with digital assets, regulatory uncertainty pushes them to rely on third-party intermediaries rather than touching crypto directly.
Dmitry Machikhin, founder and CEO of BitOK, argues that Vietnam is not at the beginning of the crypto regulation path — the country recognized crypto as property back in 2025 and launched a pilot program for digital asset trading, with locals already actively using crypto on the ground.
“What authorities should now prioritize is not prohibition but soft regulation that brings the industry out of the gray zone — giving the state new taxpayers and real market oversight,” he says.
For projects planning to enter European or global markets, Machikhin argues that compliance sequencing matters: “Study the target jurisdiction thoroughly, adapt the business to its standards, only then deploy.” On AML, he is direct: “In 2026 every serious company needs a dedicated AML specialist capable of screening high-risk financial flows. Rushing this preparation is a liability, not a shortcut.”
On the question of global standards, he notes that while there is no single universal framework, FATF rules serve as the baseline recognized across the vast majority of jurisdictions, and MiCA is quickly becoming a de facto template — already adopted by more than ten countries outside the EU. “Even where MiCA seems like sufficient guidance, local adjustments and limits must be mapped jurisdiction by jurisdiction.”
From Stablecoin Transfers to Embedded Payment Infrastructure
The agenda also featured “Stablecoins Won the Payments War. What Comes Next?”, with Berken Menges, Chief Marketing Officer at CoinTracking; Carney Mak, Partner at FXHB Asset Management; Nathanael Christian, Co-Founder & CEO of IDRX; Harry Bui, Analyst at The Spartan Group; and Kevin Lee, CSO at BingX.
The conversation focused on the evolution of stablecoins from a payment product into a global settlement and financial infrastructure, with particular attention to cross-border payments, tokenized assets, and integration with traditional finance. Speakers addressed regulation and transparency, FX and capital controls, and adoption dynamics across Southeast Asia and Vietnam.
Multiple speakers converged on the idea that stablecoins have proven their value primarily as settlement infrastructure rather than a retail payment method.
Harry Bui was direct on this point: “I agree stablecoin won, but not like in the way people think. It’s about a settlement layer — that is the most important here.” The cross-border and remittance lane is where adoption is most advanced: domestic payment systems in Southeast Asia are already efficient enough that stablecoins add little for local retail use, but correspondent banking for international trade remains slow, expensive, and intermediary-heavy.
Speakers broadly agreed that within two years, stablecoins will disappear into the infrastructure — absorbed into the platforms and services people already use.
As Nathanael Christian put it: “We as customers wouldn’t realize that we are using stablecoin or not. What we know is only money movement, only payment — and the whole rail would be on the blockchain for sure.” The next frontier identified by the panel is moving from individual transfers to embedded, recurring use — payroll, subscriptions, platform disbursements — where the real volume and the real business case live.
Sergey Kravtsov, Co-founder and CEO of Papaya Finance, sharpens this point into a concrete infrastructure argument.
“Every new payment rail starts with one-off transfers, because a single transfer needs no infrastructure. You send once, you are done. Remittances fit that shape perfectly, which is why Vietnam’s stablecoin volume sits there today,” Kravtsov notes.
“Recurring payments are a different problem. A subscription or a payroll run is not one transfer — it is the same relationship settling over and over on a schedule. On most chains today, each of those payments is its own on-chain transaction, with its own gas cost and its own point of failure. That is acceptable for a one-time remittance and it breaks the moment you try to run it at scale for thousands of payers every month.”
On where the infrastructure gets embedded, he adds: “The durable business is on the paying side — the platforms, payroll providers, and PSPs that need to send recurring payments to hundreds or thousands of workers at once. That is where aggregation matters, and that is where recurring settlement infrastructure gets built into something people use without thinking about crypto at all.”
Participating companies represented the full breadth of the digital asset and traditional finance sectors, including:
- Tether,
- Bybit,
- Ledger,
- HashKey Group,
- Monad,
- Metis,
- BingX,
- 1inch,
- The Spartan Group,
- Ondo Finance,
- OpenEden,
- Cactus Custody,
- Bitstamp by Robinhood,
- Orderly,
- Birdeye,
- Republic Advisory,
- Solana Superteam Vietnam,
- OrbitX,
- Synthesys,
- Kanga Global,
- CoinTracking,
- IDRX,
- TEIZA,
- SotaTek,
- OpenMax,
- Revve AI,
- GenAI Fund,
- Onigiri Capital,
- TOTM Labs,
- Varmeta,
- Hashgraph,
- DCP Co.,
- GIMA Group,
- APAC DAO,
- Nuvei,
- HSC Asset Group,
- SC Ventures,
- Dragon Capital,
- FXHB Asset Management,
- Centrifuge.
HSC Conference Ho Chi Minh City was supported by Ledger, Sonic Labs, Hypernative, Securosys, Fystack, Birdeye, Mercuryo, Addressable, and Kanga Global. Community partners included Coineasy, Akindo, SqrDAO, APAC DAO, DTC Group, Airova, 9 Cat Group, Allconfsbot, Varmeta, and GIMA. OrbitX served as the payment partner; RMIT University joined as the university partner.
Beyond the stage, the event offered a non-stop networking environment where participants connected with global and regional capital, met curated projects vetted for institutional readiness, identified partners and market-entry pathways into Vietnam, and built relationships with institutions shaping the future of digital assets.
Building a Global Institutional Finance Platform
Building on the success of HSC Conference Cannes 2026, the Ho Chi Minh City edition broadened the discussion to examine how blockchain can move beyond pilots into real financial infrastructure, what institutional digital asset adoption looks like at scale, and why mature Web3 infrastructure has yet to reach mainstream markets.
Over the past three years, HSC Conference and HSC Asset Management have developed into two complementary event series. HSC Conference brings together innovators, investors, asset managers, policymakers, and industry leaders for high-level discussions around the evolution of digital assets and financial infrastructure, while HSC Asset Management provides a more focused environment for investment, fundraising, and dealmaking. Together, they have welcomed more than 100,000 attendees and generated over 10 million social media impressions.
Upcoming editions are scheduled in Seoul and Singapore in October, Hong Kong in November, and Abu Dhabi in December.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.
About The Author
Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in crypto, AI, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.
More articles
Alisa, a dedicated journalist at the MPost, specializes in crypto, AI, investments, and the expansive realm of Web3. With a keen eye for emerging trends and technologies, she delivers comprehensive coverage to inform and engage readers in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.
