MiCA Law Sparks USDT Delisting Across Major European Exchanges
In Brief
The European Union’s Markets in Cryptoassets (MiCA) law has significantly altered digital asset monitoring, leading to the removal of Tether’s USDT stablecoin from major European exchanges.
The European Union’s Markets in Cryptoassets (MiCA) law has resulted in a substantial change in digital asset monitoring throughout the continent. MiCA was implemented to offer transparency and stability in the cryptocurrency industry, and it sets severe obligations on stablecoin issuers and crypto service providers.
One of the most noticeable repercussions of this rule is the removal of Tether’s USDT stablecoin from many major European exchanges, including Crypto.com. Tether has expressed dissatisfaction with this decision, viewing it as hurried and potentially disruptive to the market.
Understanding the MiCA Requirements
MiCA requires stablecoin issuers to have an electronic money institution license from at least one EU member state. This directive is part of a larger effort to guarantee that stablecoins, which are attached to the value of existing currencies such as the US dollar, function transparently and financially stable. Tether, the largest stablecoin by market value with roughly $139 billion in circulation, faces a threat. Tether does not have the requisite license. Hence, its USDT is not compatible with MiCA regulations.
The rule also requires stablecoin issuers to keep a large share of their collateral assets in European credit institutions. This need presents logistical issues for Tether, which holds the majority of its reserves in US Treasury securities and cash equivalents. The CEO of Tether has raised reservations about meeting this standard, noting potential dangers to USDT’s stability.
The Delisting of USDT in the EU
Crypto.com, one of the world’s major cryptocurrency exchanges, has declared plans to delist USDT in Europe by January 31, 2025, in reaction to MiCA’s enforcement. Coinbase has already delisted USDT from its European platform; thus, this decision follows a similar pattern. The delisting is part of an ongoing effort by exchanges to comply with MiCA’s stringent regulatory framework.
Users with USDT or other impacted assets have until March 31, 2025 to transform them into MiCA-compliant assets. If users fail to do so, their assets will be immediately changed to a compliant stablecoin or another asset with a comparable market value. This timeframe demonstrates the haste with which exchanges are addressing MiCA’s regulations, in order to avoid potential penalties for noncompliance.
Tether has voiced dissatisfaction with the quick rate at which exchanges are delisting USDT. The business considers these moves premature and potentially damaging to consumers who rely on USDT for transactions. Tether is aggressively looking for methods to address regulatory issues, including investing in initiatives that comply with European rules. For example, Tether has sponsored startups that specialize in euro-based stablecoins that are fully regulatory compliant.
However, the major issue is Tether’s failure to meet MiCA’s license standards. The company’s unwillingness to transfer a large amount of its reserves to European banks demonstrates the complexities of complying with these laws. This case highlights the difficulties encountered by worldwide stablecoin issuers working in an area with strict regulatory regulations.
MiCA’s introduction represents a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrency assets in Europe. The regulation is intended to improve consumer protection, prevent market manipulation, and maintain financial stability. MiCA aims to enhance market confidence and attract institutional investment by forcing crypto service providers to get licenses and follow stringent operating criteria.
MiCA offers both possibilities and difficulties to smaller firms and startups in the cryptocurrency market. While the law provides clarity and legal certainty, its strict standards can act as a barrier to entry for businesses that lack the means to comply. This might result in a more concentrated market in which larger businesses with the resources to satisfy regulatory requirements dominate.
The Future of Stablecoins in MiCA
The future of stablecoins such as USDT in Europe is uncertain. While some exchanges continue to offer USDT, others have delisted it to avoid regulatory issues. This incident emphasizes the necessity for stablecoin issuers to adapt to changing regulatory settings. Tether’s efforts to create compatible stablecoins, such as euro-based alternatives, demonstrate this need.
MiCA’s long-term success will depend on its ability to strike a balance between regulatory monitoring and innovation. Regulations must adapt to new technologies such as DeFi and non-fungible tokens to remain relevant as the cryptocurrency industry evolves.
Expert Perspectives on MiCA’s Impact on the Crypto Market
Industry analysts have varying viewpoints on MiCA’s influence on Tether and the larger crypto market. Some experts feel that the delisting of USDT in Europe will have little impact on Tether’s total market position, given that Asia accounts for a substantial amount of its trading volume. For example, Axel Bitblaze stated that “80% of USDT’s trading volume comes from Asia, so the EU delisting will not have much of an impact.”
Others, such as financial expert Jacob Kinge, warn that USDT’s noncompliance might cause severe disruptions, including higher trading costs and less market liquidity. Kinge stated that a formal ban on USDT would most certainly raise transaction costs and disrupt market liquidity, potentially impacting cross-border trades and arbitrage opportunities.
According to Joseph Hurtado, founder of Granata Consulting, banning USDT may harm Europe’s position as a hub for cryptocurrency innovation. This viewpoint emphasizes the larger consequences of MiCA’s enforcement on the European crypto ecosystem, which might lead to a shift in market dynamics and innovation hubs.
A renowned analyst, Michaël van de Poppe, has raised worry over a probable market downturn owing to MiCA’s influence on USDT, indicating that “the market could be crashing.” Other experts, however, contend that the negative consequences may not be as severe as previously thought, urging for a cautious approach to measuring the regulation’s effects.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, please note that the information provided on this page is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other form of advice. It is important to only invest what you can afford to lose and to seek independent financial advice if you have any doubts. For further information, we suggest referring to the terms and conditions as well as the help and support pages provided by the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice.
About The Author
Victoria is a writer on a variety of technology topics including Web3.0, AI and cryptocurrencies. Her extensive experience allows her to write insightful articles for the wider audience.
More articles
Victoria is a writer on a variety of technology topics including Web3.0, AI and cryptocurrencies. Her extensive experience allows her to write insightful articles for the wider audience.
